Misplaced priority: You can increase her breasts but can't help with his feet. NHS pay for this woman's 36DD breasts but refuse to pay £24,000 for boy to walk.

They are two cases which have been slammed as a damning indictment of the twisted priorities of the NHS.

A toddler has been refused a crucial operation which could help him walk because it is not deemed worthy of funding by NHS bureaucrats.

But just a few miles from where little Oliver Dockerty, two, could be given the gift of mobility, an NHS hospital performed a breast enlargement operation for an aspiring glamour model because it was considered necessary for health reasons.

The stark contrast between the way Josie Cunningham and Oliver Dockerty, who has cerebral palsy, have been treated caused outrage today.

The NHS was accused of having a 'skewed sense of priorities'.

Claire Dockerty, the toddler's mother, criticised the NHS for turning him down for a life-changing operation.

But the case is in stalk contrast to that of Miss Cunningham - the aspiring glamour model had her breasts enlarged to size 36DD on the NHS.

The surgery to 22-year-old cost taxpayers £4,800.

She convinced doctors, at St James’s Hospital in Leeds - a few miles from where specialists could help the two-year-old walk again - to operate by claiming her flat chest was ‘ruining her life’ and causing emotional distress.

Yea, flat breast will cause you emotional distress. My God, what a joke. The boy's legs could ruin his life forever. It's a shame how the world have come to loss all sense of what is right. Enlarging a breast is okay but helping a young child with his legs isn't. Wow, I see. No, I don't see.